by CircleBoy » May 1st, 2012, 4:18 pm
- Cautiousness throughout the game. Generally if you're cautious you have something to hide and you don't want to be spotted. Generally (obviously not always), recklessness is associated with town as the mafia wouldn't want to put themselves in the limelight in such a way, especially as they'd be lynching off townies.
>I point you to game one in which I played the exact same opening and was town. A game in which you were mafia and killed me btw
- Discussion of the rules/roles rather than of posts in the game itself. Mafia don't want to tread on any toes so will play it safe and ask questions about the game itself early on. This is linked with filler posts.
>Don't even understand this one
- Decision to no lynch instantly, and ignore all other posts in the thread. No discussion benefits mafia as then no evidence can be gathered from day 1 posting. CB was making out as if lynching someone meant you couldn't change your lynch afterwards and that a person would definitely have to die.
>See first response, also pressuring on day 1 gives as much info to mafia as town. We could get into an argument about the best way to play mafia but then your argument would just be "CB is mafia because he plays sub optimaly"
- Ghost's buddying with CB. Ghost has looked very suspicious as well and he's been following what CB has been saying a lot.
>From what I've gathered ghost just likes that I'm actualy explaining my actions, which we sorely lacked game 1.
- His constant reference to the other game. He kept on saying "he's done this before" etc, rather than commenting on the actual game being played.
>He's dfone this before IS a comment on the current game, you need to be doing something in THIS game for me to even make this comment. Jesus edgar. It's not my fault you cant change up your playstyle.
- Rather than questioning the lynches on him, he just counter-lynched those people with the sole reason of "they lynched me".
>And I withdrew those lynches...I mean you said it earlier in this very post a lynch vote isnt final, then when thetime came for my real lynch (you) I gave reasons. It also amuses me that several people voted to lynch me with no stated reason but I'm the suspicious one when I counter lynch (and withdraw).
- His defence stinks of desperation and he's clutching at straws. Rather than trying to infer as to why people lynched in groups, as they did, he simply said it was "suspicious" that they did. He didn't infer because he knew the reason why.
>What am I meant to say edgar...nobody says anyhting in topic and then theres a cluster lynch vote on me. What am I meant to take from this other than that there has been some out of topic communication? How can I adress this communication when I am not privy to it? Who are literaly within the rules of the game given the ability to communicate out of topic? The mafia
- He was after fap or aidan first as he knew given their playing styles they'd be easy to get lynched off but saw there was an opportunity to turn the bandwagon onto me, and did so very slyly.
>So earlier on you say I counterlynched without thought and that was suspicious. But now you've ascribed reason to those lynches and made those reasons suspicious. Which is it edgar? Aidan isnt that suspicious imo, at least he justified his actions when he made them.