Season 3 Match format.

[Maddude]

Yer so 3v3 or 4v4.

Then what map at a later stage.

[Mick]

4V4!!!
More team based! More exciting! All the other forums do it!

[Shockboy]

^^^^ this

its like if the uk decided playing 7's instead of 11's for our pro football just now

[Maddude]

As you probably know I'd prefer 4v4's and here are some of my reasons:

• More team based.
  
• Faster, more sharper passing needed.
  
• More people involved.
  
• Faster paced games.

Only problems I can see are hosts having to be much better but we should be fine with that and not having enough active members as I would say squad limit be increased to 6 for 4v4 at least.

3/4 people means everyone gets enough playing time where as 3/5 not as much.
4/6 still gives people enough playing time as well with more spots to be filled.

[Guest]

Poland play 3v3?

[Maddude]

Poland play 3v3?

Poland has shed loads of communities and quite a lot of communities do 3v3 and adjacent 4v4 leagues which teams can choose which one or both to compete in.

[Cheese]

4v4!

Faster,
More players in the league,
Alot more fun(imo) 3v3 can be such a drag sometimes,
Seems to be the most popular competitive format,
:o

[CircleBoy]

4v4. Everything I'd say has been said

[Aidan]

hmmmmmmm if its a 4v4 league, can we make the cup 3v3 then ?

[Ghost]

So long as we stick to regular big I don't mind playing 4v4. I HATE big easy with a passion.

[CircleBoy]

Could the people voting 3v3 actualy get involved here? So far we've got a whole topic full of people saying 4v4 and why...but its only leading by 2.

[noj]

4v4, for the reasons mad and cheese listed.

[Maddude]

I like the idea of having a 3v3 cup but that's for another vote then.

Squad limits at 6 is good for 4v4 right?

[Ghost]

Yeah, make it 5 mandatory, 6 optional.

[rising star]

I think 3v3 is way better than 4v4 for the following Reasons

>Less Players than 4v4,Meaning more Responsibility on each Player.
>More space to run with the ball.
>You can play different styles, In 4v4,you have to kind of play the Passing game, But in 3v3,you can choose if you want to Pass alot or Have a slower gameplay!

Thanks for opening the poll for rest,admins

[noj]

>More space to run with the ball.

But can't you see that's a bad thing? The more you have to run with the ball, the easier it is for people to catch you.

In 3s you have two options on the ball pretty much, 1. try to play the cross-field pass 2. go down the line. In 4s, you have the extra player in the middle of the pitch which opens up more possibilities.

[Maddude]

I think 3v3 is way better than 4v4 for the following Reasons

>Less Players than 4v4,Meaning more Responsibility on each Player.
>More space to run with the ball.
>You can play different styles, In 4v4,you have to kind of play the Passing game, But in 3v3,you can choose if you want to Pass alot or Have a slower gameplay!

Thanks for opening the poll for rest,admins

Firstly, why would you not play the passing game..this is a team game, you do know right?
The ball moves faster than you and you can get space on 4v4 if you position correctly, you should look to pass anyway.
More responsibility, the problem being that you can't always be aggressive because if you are then when you make a mistake it would normally lead to conceding a goal.

[Lekumberri]

I voted 3v3.

Because:

- I think 4v4 is very crowded, in my case I don't know what to do, there's not enough space to play. More rebounds.

- More lag usually (8 people, subs and maybe 1 or 2 referees).

- I don't think more people can play, at least not only in this way. We can do the same incresing the league until 10 teams, like in Spanish Haxball Liga for example, and with more divisions if necesary.

Also thank you for open the poll.

See you.

[Zizou]

Voted 3v3 but honestly does not matter to me.

[OvoXo]

I voted to balance the polls. xD. Trolololol.
But seriously, I don't mind.