Milk wrote:lr16 wrote:I remember! You know the actual times that Caths were successful? Yeah, those times.
It's hard to imagine why your mum didn't have an abortion.
Wow, that's a bit personal...
A forum for the hungry members of the Haxball community.
Milk wrote:lr16 wrote:I remember! You know the actual times that Caths were successful? Yeah, those times.
It's hard to imagine why your mum didn't have an abortion.
jonnyynnoj wrote:If it was grouped by pos, yea mental + technical would = better player. With everyone grouped together you remove the positional factors and so its just a graph of mental v technical, not who is better than who. It's not supposed to compare players across different positions and you shouldn't think of it that way.
Rénbeaudach wrote:thought I ought to add a few more well-known players to fill it out a bit and be more edgy.
+ we can't have maddude being to smug as the 'best player in FM'
Cam_Sampbell wrote:After pata joined MD, he and anglo only conceded 4 goals from 8 league games (with 4 clean sheets), so I reckon they should be higher imo
mlfaijati wrote:Cam_Sampbell wrote:After pata joined MD, he and anglo only conceded 4 goals from 8 league games (with 4 clean sheets), so I reckon they should be higher imo
He had anglo as his DM tbf, that mans a beast.
Cam_Sampbell wrote:mlfaijati wrote:Cam_Sampbell wrote:After pata joined MD, he and anglo only conceded 4 goals from 8 league games (with 4 clean sheets), so I reckon they should be higher imo
He had anglo as his DM tbf, that mans a beast.
Hence why I mentioned both
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests