

A forum for the hungry members of the Haxball community.
Cam_Sampbell wrote:Well, what's better, having players compete to try to win places in teams, or having players rot as a 6th player in a team? As if there are 6 players in a team, managers who want success won't play all 6 players, except for the rare occasion that their players aren't available.
Girgensons wrote:Cam_Sampbell wrote:Well, what's better, having players compete to try to win places in teams, or having players rot as a 6th player in a team? As if there are 6 players in a team, managers who want success won't play all 6 players, except for the rare occasion that their players aren't available.
You're making things up now.
As for my team, if the roster limit would be 6, FM would gain 1 new player. If it was 10, it would gain 5 new players. Is it not better to have more players and better, more competitive teams with less 2vs3, 2vs2, 3vs4 games and awkward position changes due to someone not turning up?
Rachel wrote:I've had all 5 players turn up to every game.
Every one of my players can play at least 2 positions - so no 'out of position' is necessary. Therefore your point is entirely invalid here.
Girgensons wrote:Rachel wrote:I've had all 5 players turn up to every game.
What's the probability of that happening 15 times in a row?
Are there 80 players in this community that are good at hax and able to be online every evening? No.
Every player that I picked for my team was online every night before the season started. Now one of them disappeared completely before the 1st Cup round. Is that something I could've predicted before? No. Does that hinder my chances of advancing to the 2nd round? Yes, it does. Would such a problem arise with a bigger roster limit? No, it wouldn't.
Every one of my players can play at least 2 positions - so no 'out of position' is necessary. Therefore your point is entirely invalid here.
Everyone can play several positions, the level of play though is going to differ. You don't see David Villa playing as a central defender very often, because Puyol has been injured, or Xavi as a GK?
Basically, the only thing you've said is that you don't want to have 6 players in your team. I'm not arguing with that, because it's your choice.
>The question though is, why shouldn't other teams have 6 players on their roster if they feel that this would improve their game?
We've got 30 players rotting in the reserve league and loads of others that aren't free agents yet/anymore. We don't lack the players, so where's the problem?
>Well, that's just unfortunate, but as you say, there are plenty of players that could replace him if you feel the need to.
>Haxball =/= Football, there is a vast difference between the skill levels needed for haxball and football.
Well, personally I'd rather see players playing regularly in a reserves league, and showing off their abilities, rather than playing very occasionally.
Girgensons wrote:
"I'd rather see players regularly playing in Div 1, rather than playing very occasionally in the reserve league." What now? :>
opc wrote:Girgensons wrote:
"I'd rather see players regularly playing in Div 1, rather than playing very occasionally in the reserve league." What now? :>
Surely you must be aware how silly this statement is?
Girgensons wrote:opc wrote:Girgensons wrote:
"I'd rather see players regularly playing in Div 1, rather than playing very occasionally in the reserve league." What now? :>
Surely you must be aware how silly this statement is?
Of course. Cam made things up (6th player never getting to play; 6th player forever stuck in a team that doesn't play him; no reserve league once the roster limit is marginally increased) and used that to justify his position. I did the same to show how ludicrous that is, that's all.
opc wrote:Girgensons wrote:opc wrote:Girgensons wrote:
"I'd rather see players regularly playing in Div 1, rather than playing very occasionally in the reserve league." What now? :>
Surely you must be aware how silly this statement is?
Of course. Cam made things up (6th player never getting to play; 6th player forever stuck in a team that doesn't play him; no reserve league once the roster limit is marginally increased) and used that to justify his position. I did the same to show how ludicrous that is, that's all.
But they're not comparable. One is very likely to happen in most teams, one isn't. Can you guess which is which?
Girgensons wrote:Why the fuck a division 2 team is completely randomly representing FM in the Champions League?
Who made that decision and how is that fair in respect to other teams?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests